Archive for the ‘Microsoft AdCenter (BING)’ Category

Planning and Measuring SEM Goals: State of Search 2011 pt.1

August 16th, 2011

Decades ago, before we had access to Google, Bing, and the whole of the Internet providing the world at our fingertips, search was a laborious, time-consuming effort.

For instance, if you landed in Honolulu for a 10-day vacation in the Hawaiian Islands and wanted to know where you could find the nearest Puka Dog Hut, you’d have to phone down to the front desk of your hotel and talk to the concierge.

More than likely, they would reply with “Oh, sir, you don’t want to eat that. Perhaps I could recommend the Sansei Sushi Bar for some Asian-Pacific Rim cuisine?”

“That’s not what I wanted. I want a Puka Dog.”

“But, sir, really…”

You get how this is going; we don’t need to belabor the issue. Before the internet, search was cumbersome and unreliable. Therefore, it’s easy to understand and accept the idea that the present state of search is strong, getting stronger every day. How do we know this for certain? The numbers.

I can get a complete listing of Puka Dog Huts in Hawaii from Google in 0.26 seconds. Ease of access is not only turning consumers to search-related resources for their each and every need, but access to this extent is also developing greater and greater levels of impatience in the searchers. We want what we want and we want it now.

Before planning your SEM goals, let’s look at the numbers.

In the State of Search 2011 report, it was projected that search engine marketing (SEM) spending for North America would grow from $16.6 billion to $19.3 billion in 2011. This represents a 14% increase. In fact, the percentage of increase for SEM spending grew 32.19% from 2009 to 2011. That growth rate increase towers over the paltry 19.3% increase that the Oil Drilling Industry saw in the same time period.

Some 54% of all businesses plan to increase SEM/SEO spending, while only 10% plan on spending less (but you can find them in the yellow pages, I’m sure). According to the study, increased spending for 2011 will be focused on:

  1. Paid Search (PPC/Paid Inclusion)
  2. Search Engine Optimization
  3. Facebook PPC Advertising
  4. Search-Related Technology
  5. Mobile Internet

It’s not difficult to imagine that all your competitors are looking into the 2011 and 2012 marketing budgets and figuring out how to spend more effectively on their SEM programs and how to differentiate themselves in the market.

The immediate question for any small business owner is “How does our company define our SEM goals and objectives?” If you like, start with the basics. The state of search 2011 data shows that surveyed business owners plan to allocate their SEM outlays toward the fulfillment of five main business objectives.

Business objectives that companies are trying to achieve through SEM (by percentage of importance):

42% Drive traffic to the website
29% Generate leads
18% Sell products or services
10% Increase brand awareness
01% Improve customer service

The data above shows that a predominance of businesses have come to the realization that converting prospects and generating leads begins with website traffic numbers. Driving traffic to your site is the first step. Converting those visitors into customers is the next. Therefore, your SEM planning has much to do with luring prospects, content development, and on-site conversion rate optimization.

As you can also see from the data above, a slightly-lower percentage of businesses view sales and lead generation as a primary SEM objective. Although much of your typical SEM effort is geared toward getting traffic to the site in the first place, there are many that believe this traffic has an inherent value for outbound sales efforts.

The bottom three responses are fairly typical of SEM and e-marketing efforts in previous years, back when web marketing served to point visitors at product pages and optimization efforts attempted to shorten the path between product and check-out (as if we’d learned nothing from the decades before the dawn of relationship selling).

Note: In the forthcoming State of Search 2011 (pt. 2) article, we’ll discuss defining and measuring social media marketing, but it bears mentioning at this point that increased brand awareness is the top objective for social media marketing.

When measuring your SEM goals, the focus is on data that allows your on-staff SEM, or SEM support agency, to track the progress of a campaign toward your pre-defined objectives (as in above paragraphs). At this time, we are speaking directly about metrics for measuring SEM efforts and analyzing the results. There are a number of avenues for measuring SEM performance, but once again, we’ll return to the survey data to see the top responses from those businesses with active SEM campaigns.

The three most important metrics for use in gauging the success of SEM efforts toward pre-defined goals:

1. Site traffic metrics
2. Conversion rates
3. Click-through rates

Similar to recent years, site traffic metrics and conversion rates are the top two metrics for measuring the success of SEM programs. The click-through rate has seen an increase in importance since last year. Once again, more companies have come to the realization that converting prospects and generating leads with an SEM program will begin with quality ads that draw the eyes and the clicks. No clicks, no traffic, no sales.

In the end, planning and measuring a competitive SEM program first requires a defined, attainable, measurable set of SEM goals. Analyzing the results of your SEM campaign allows your marketing staff or agency to track the progress of your campaigns toward this pre-defined set of goals. And although the metrics for a large e-marketing campaign over a spread of media may include ongoing keyword research and evaluation, web site usability testing, competitive analysis, conversion evaluation, continuing development and testing of PPC ads – your site traffic metrics, conversion rate and ad placement are three top metrics for gauging your success in meeting your SEM goals.

Bing Changes Policy on PPC Trademark Infringement

March 16th, 2011

In mid-February, Microsoft announced that a sweeping change would be made to their Intellectual Property Guidelines for advertisements that support Bing and Yahoo’s PPC marketing. Of those proposed changes, the most significant to search advertisers is the planned change to Microsoft’s Investigations Policy, in which it is stated that adCenter will no longer review trademark keyword complaints. The new policy change went into effect on March 3rd.

In a direct-email statement from the Microsoft Advertising adCenter team to their advertisers, Microsoft did state that adCenter will continue to investigate brand owner complaints related to trademark use in ad text.

The current Microsoft policy informs its advertisers that “As an advertiser, you are responsible for ensuring that your use of keywords and ad content, including trademarks and logos, does not infringe or violate the intellectual property rights of others.

Although most seasoned advertisers would see the policy as simple enough, others would say that Microsoft is turning soft on those who play fast and loose with the rules regarding trademarked terms in search keyword lists that support their ads.

To cement the change, Microsoft’s policy goes on to state the proper procedure for issues concerning trademark infringement – in the text of a search ad alone. “If a trademark owner is concerned that its trademark is being used improperly in ad text on ads served by either Bing or Yahoo! Search, it should first contact the advertiser directly to address the issue.”

That certainly seems easy enough – and if a trademark owner is dissatisfied with the outcome of their conversation with the offending party, they can then fill out a Trademark Misuse Form (which, by the way, asks for the trademark term, owner, registration number, and country of origin) and Microsoft will begin an investigation into the ad text. Keywords are fair game.

Here is an example of how the policy change would look to the average ad:

Prior to March 3rd

Sportswear giant Nike cannot successfully bid on the term “Adidas” for their ads. If Nike submits “Adidas” as one of their chosen keywords, the ad is routed to Microsoft, and the keyword usage is summarily declined. Adidas never hears about the attempted infringement.

After March 3rd

Nike can absolutely bid on the term “Adidas” for their ads, and the keyword is instantly placed online.

The fallout (or benefit – depending on how you look at it) in the search advertising game is that those who have been busted by Microsoft for keyword trademark abuses in the past, can now re-submit those keywords.

Although the new Microsoft YaBing! policy appears to be kicking open a door for trademark name infringement in the keyword lists that drive search ads, this policy change-up isn’t anything new for search advertisers that regularly use Google AdWords for their online advertising. Microsoft’s new trademark policy closely resembles the Google trademark policy on sponsored links.

Although Google believes that advertisers “are responsible for the keywords they choose to generate advertisements and the text that they choose to use in those advertisements,” the company will not investigate issues of ad keyword infringement outside of the following regions: Australia, Brazil, China, Hong Kong, Macau, New Zealand, North, Korea, South Korea, and Taiwan.

Much like Microsoft, Google also encourages trademark owners “to resolve their disputes directly with the advertisers, particularly because the advertisers may have similar ads running via other advertising programs.

Again, if you’re in the search adverting business, and you just happen to practice your craft in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, or the other 243 listed regions where Google investigates trademark infringement complaints on ad copy alone, your keywords lists are wide open for any competing brand name additions you’d like to include.

The Wrap Up:

Some may wonder why the major search engines allow advertising to include trademarked names in their keywords lists but not in their ad copy. The answer may be as simple as visibility and labor costs.

Borrowed trade names such as Nike or Adidas that are buried in keywords lists are – by and large – invisible to the searcher. Only the ad text is apparent. This may be why Google and Microsoft have turned soft on infringement complaints in these areas. Additionally, it takes a good bit of staff and labor to investigate these complaints. The new policy is creating an “out of sight, out of mind” attitude to trademarked text.

The concerned owner of any trademarked brand that is currently advertised through any of the major search engines will surely want to create a greater offense in their ad strategy. Aggressive bidding may ensure that your impression share and ad positions will help support and protect your trademarked terms.

Online Ad Spending Passes Print Advertising

January 17th, 2011

They were surely giving each other a lot of high-fives at the Google AdWords offices in Mountain View, Ann Arbor, and New York, as it was recently reported that spending in online advertising had finally caught up to traditional print advertising – and easily passed them by. According to eMarketer, domestic spending on online ads will hit $25.8 billion this year, surpassing the $22.8 billion spent on print ads in newspapers for the same time period. Given that, Q4 of 2010 will be remembered as the first period that online advertising finally overtook newspaper advertising in total spending.

emarketer ad spending graph

As the consumers shift away from print readership, marketers are pouring billions into internet ads – creating double-digit growth for online marketing. Newspapers are feeling the pinch as advertising dollars shrink. For advertisers, print media presents a major problem. Success is difficult – maybe impossible – to measure. Any newspaper advertising office will tell a prospective buyer that the general populace still reads printed publications. However, you only have to ask your local butcher, baker, or candlestick maker about their experience with print advertising and you’ll hear no lack of caterwauling about how they can’t see a measurable increase in sales when they unleash a print advertising campaign. More and more, local businesses find it hard to justify the print media expenditure. On the flipside, businesses of all types are turning in droves to online advertising. But is investing print advertising a bad proposition entirely? Has the success of online advertising doomed print advertising for good?

We all know that the success of online advertising has been a long time coming; but print ads still serve a purpose,” said David Barnes, Founder and President of Sweet Spot Marketing. “As a pull-marketing strategy, online advertising continues to grow and see enormous success. Last year, total domestic online ad spending reached $25.6 billion. And now, Forester Research predicts that by 2014 we’ll see spending reach $32 billion or more. At Sweet Spot Marketing, we know the value of online advertising in any campaign but we’ve also learned that the competitive landscape sometimes calls for a marketing plan that is supplemented by traditional print advertising. Strange as it may sound, print ads sometimes help us create and support a more successful online campaign.”

This is a glimmer of good news for the print ad industry, perhaps. But the beleaguered newsprint business isn’t too happy with current events. According to the Newspaper Association of America, daily ad revenues (not adjusted for inflation) reached their all-time peak in 2000 and have seen declines every year since. It’s no secret that scores of newspapers have seen closures, cutbacks, and bankruptcy. A report titled “Specifics on Newspapers” from the State of News Media recently claimed that the newspaper industry has shed a full fifth of its journalists since 2001.

So what does a downturn in advertising dollars mean for the future of daily and national newspapers? It’s hard to say with great accuracy. Yes, there is genuine advertising dollar depletion and soaring newsprint prices. Mixed with erosion in newspaper readership, it becomes an uncomfortable state of affairs for newspaper ad people across the country. But experts in the industry point to a new dawn for printed news materials in small print runs and via e-papers customized for content. A second life for print ads may come from the growing popularity of e-readers and tablet devices.