Archive for the ‘Bing’ Category

10 Reasons Why PPC Advertising Beats Yellow Pages Every Time

November 21st, 2011

For the purposes of this article, the term “yellow pages” is meant to refer to any non-specific telephone directory of businesses that was commonly printed on yellow paper (of which there were many) and their present online assets.

There was once a time when the yellow pages reigned supreme. This was probably 20 years ago (in 1992), right about the time that Delphi began offering the first full Internet service to its customers, before AOL, Prodigy, and CompuServe came online. Back then, if your business wasn’t listed in the in the yellow pages you were effectively undetectable to your potential customers. But that was before the advent of the internet and the web as we know it. Before 14.27 billion indexed web pages. Before affordable, high-speed internet access for all. Before pay-per-click (PPC) advertising brought Google billions and billions in annual advertising revenues.

Interesting notes: Some print directory industry insiders have publicly stated that use of the yellow pages has declined in exact correlation with the adoption of high-speed internet access across the nation. Additionally, trending for yellow pages online directories is worse today than it was in 2004 (according to Google Trends).

Perhaps it is too easy to say that the days of paging through the phone book and pouring over ads for a plumber that makes after-hours service calls during a holiday weekend are over. Then again, who among us would go to all that trouble if the plumber we needed was just a click away?

As more and more homes became wired for lightning-fast access to search results and information, it is easy to assume that very few people would choose to trudge to the hall closet and pull out that thick book of yellow pages and spend half an hour looking through a mess of tiny listings for a plumber that suited their specific needs – especially not when Google can give you about 2,000 results for a local plumber in 0.21 seconds, as well as location information, service rankings and search ads with money-saving coupons.

In 2008, there was an article written by a marketing manager for one of the largest phone directory publishers in the nation, in which he stated that the yellow pages was only relevant to two population groups: the lower social-economic segment of society and the over 50 years of age market. He went on to suggest that the yellow pages was probably a valuable place to advertise if either of those two groups was a primary demographic for a business owner. Ouch.

Given the significant decline in printed directory usage, the old yellow pages publishers have moved their operations online – getting onboard with ads that run in both the print directory and their new online directories. Problem is: It’s hard to compete with Google search. The barriers to entry are now too high for a simple search directory to have any significant draw or lasting effect. With mobile devices the default search settings are set to use Google or BING. Thus, we can only assume the separation between  online directories and rise of major search engines is a trend that will continue as mobile usage increases.

So let’s look at the comparison to PPC advertising. What makes PPC advertising such a valuable asset to a business owner (of any size) when the yellow pages are calling?

  1. Targeting – PPC advertising enables you to target hundreds or even thousands of people looking specifically for businesses just like yours. By targeting people as they search, you’re reaching prospects who are ready to make a buying decision. You’re not buried in a three-pound book at the top of a hall closet or in an specific online directory under your competitors listings.
  2. Cost – PPC advertising allows the business owner to set their own budget. Simple as that. No more escalating “rate card charges” for annual placement in a book or online directory that fewer people are turning to each and every day. No costly online ad contracts.
  3. Tracking – PPC campaigns, married with FREE website analytics, will tell you how many clicks you received from your ad and what those visitors viewed on your website. Unless a caller tells you that they found your ad through the yellow pages, how would you ever know?
  4. Controlled Exposure – Want PPC ads to show in one part of town but not another? You can control exactly where your ads show through geo-targeting.
  5. Content that Changes – PPC ads, much like web content, is something that is quick and easy to change. How many times have you seen business ads with the wrong phone number, address or hours of operation? That kind of incorrect information can cost a business dozens of potential customers over the course of a year.
  6. No Contracts – Sweet Spot’s PPC management is month to month. With a yellow pages directory, a 6 month contract is typcial.
  7. Share of Voice – With a print or online directory, you’re competing with every other plumber who has a listing. With PPC ads, you compete only against those who are on the first page at Google.
  8. Market Share – A simple numbers game: All yellow pages properties combined probably represent about 2% of the total search market share. Google, BING and Yahoo control ~95% of the search market. Where are you going to put your marketing budget dollars?search-market-share
  9. Impressions – Your yellow pages directory sales representative will tell you that they have an extraordinary amount of impressions for their pages. Count how many individual listings are on that page and divide. Are those impressions for your area of the city specifically? Divide again. Try to get out of the CPM buying model. Calculate your expected Cost-Per-Click (CPC) for Yellow Pages, and you might find it to be twice (perhaps more) as high as your PPC costs.
  10. Transparency – With a PPC campaign, the business owner has the ability to track everything through reporting. This is important when factoring in PPC offered by the yellow page directory sites. They may want to drive the clicks you paid for to your business listing on their URL and not your actual site.

SMX East 2011 Recap Pt 1 – Google +1 and Schema.org

September 26th, 2011

The Search Marketing Expo in New York, also known as SMX East, wound up festivities on September 15th after three days of speakers and programs that bill themselves as the “World’s Leading Search Engine Marketing Conference.”

SMX, produced by the fine folks at Search Engine Land, did not disappoint. They delivered an incredibly-comprehensive educational and networking experience for hundreds of search marketers, techies and business professionals from all over the globe.

The programming was chock-full of essential tidbits – almost too much to mention, even in a series of blog articles – but there were some interesting takeaways that absolutely bear mentioning:

1. “Google +1s not influencing search rankings,” said Tiffany Oberoi, Software Engineer at Google. This was a hot item that surfaced in the Making Data From Google Webmaster Central & Bing Webmaster Tools Actionable panel.

Google steadfastly asserts that they do not currently use +1s for ranking purposes, despite what numerous others have said. Ms. Oberoi, who works in search quality, showed the attendees the +1 metrics in Google Webmaster Tools and reassured all that they are not a ranking factor at the moment. Could this change? Certainly. We shall wait and see.

2. “Microformats are the game changer in allowing your content to be found,” said Topher Kohan, SEO Coordinator at CNN. Mr. Kohan addressed the crowd at the Schema.org, Rel=Author & Meta Tagging For 2012 panel and gave listeners a highly-informed look at the history of microformats and a look at their expected future.

Microformats are a semantic markup that has been in XHTML for years. It allows site owners and content developers to utilize a library of mark-up elements that address site content and tell the engines and bots more about what the content is actually all about. The really great aspect of semantic mark-up is that it allows the site owners to make content available to as many possible sources – creating even more access to content than ever before.

The big player in microformats is, of course, Schema.org, an initiative launched on June 2nd of 2011 by Google, Bing, and Yahoo! to introduce the concept of the semantic web to websites and create a common vocabulary for structured data markup on our pages. The official Google blog post on the Schema.org initiative states that “Schema.org introduces schemas for more than a hundred new categories, including movies, music, organizations, TV shows, products, places and more. As webmasters add this markup to their sites, search engines can develop richer search experiences.”

In other words (and as an example direct from the Schema.org site), you may have an item on your site about the 2009 blockbuster film Avatar that was directed by James Cameron. By using the itemscope element, you can specify that the HTML contained in the <div>…</div> block is about Avatar the “Movie” and not about the avatar concept in Hinduism or Avatar the Swedish death metal band.

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Movie”>

  <h1>Avatar</h1>

  <span>Director: James Cameron (born August 16, 1954)</span>

  <span>Science fiction</span>

  <a href=”../movies/avatar-theatrical-trailer.html”>Trailer</a>

</div>

Once microformats are explained in a way that makes it easy to understand how these elements are further addressing content on sites, it becomes simple enough to understand.

Join us next week for pt. 2 of the Search Marketing Expo East wrap-up.

Yahoo Search Direct – Delivering Answers not Links

March 24th, 2011

Search engine giant Yahoo has some interesting news for Bing, Google and nearly two-billion internet users worldwide. Search is changing again. Yahoo is fearlessly calling their new breakthrough search feature “the fastest thing you have ever seen.”

The new Yahoo search feature, which debuted in beta this week, is called Search Direct and appears to take some inspiration from Google Instant – a search enhancement that instantaneously displays suggested results as the user types their request. Note: Google Instant was introduced on September 8th of last year.

Much like Google Instant, the Yahoo Search Direct feature presents instant search results as the user types. The results come in the form of a drop-down box that displays a top-ten list of instant search result options. But Yahoo isn’t calling these instant search results by their common name. To Yahoo, these are not search results or mere links. They’re answers. And Yahoo execs are betting that instant access to answers will draw the interest of the searching public and keep the clicks coming.

I want you to remember three words: answers, not links,” said Shashi Seth, Yahoo’s Vice President for Search, to a gathering of tech news reporters at a recent demonstration of the new search feature in San Francisco.

The new Yahoo Search Direct marketing is furthering the idea of answers over links by calling the development “a powerful new feature that provides direct access to the answers and sites you need – with fewer clicks and fewer hassles.”

One of the most interesting aspects in this is that Yahoo says it can come up with new ad formats that fit in the Search Direct box. This could get interesting if Yahoo wanted to keep this revenue stream separate from BING because currently they handle their PPC search ads.

Yahoo suggests that Search Direct is superior to Google Instant Search, by saying that Google’s search enhancement only displays search results pages faster, while the Yahoo feature strives to deliver quick, relevant answers for common search interests across a spectrum of categories.

One unique feature that separates Search Direct from Google Instant is that Search Direct shows the searcher the top ten hottest-trending topics before you even begin searching (this feature activates when you put your cursor in the search field box). Yahoo calls this a “unique results format” and “a beautiful way to take back your time.”

Initially, Yahoo Search Direct has answers for a limited number of search categories: music, movies, weather, celebrities, athletes, news items, shopping, some local information by city, and information on stocks by ticker symbol.

Since their highly-publicized merger with Microsoft and Bing, the case for Yahoo’s relevancy among the big-three search engines has been in question. Some early reviewers suggest that the new feature might even put Yahoo search in direct conflict with Bing. But engineers at Yahoo clearly believe that the business of the day is re-engineering search functions to better the user experience.

“People still come to Yahoo and search on Yahoo,” said Yahoo chief product officer Blake Irving.  Yahoo is confident that they have re-engineered the search experience to match the changing needs of searchers around the globe. For Yahoo, the future is now.

At present, Search Direct is live on search.yahoo.com and other domestic Yahoo search properties. Search Direct is not available via the main Yahoo homepage at this time. According to Shashi Seth, the Search Direct experience will soon be native to all Yahoo-based properties.